Saturday, 19 July 2025
Gaza's Children asking
my speech at the national march for# Palestine
Thursday, 10 July 2025
Do Not Despair
This
is a message to myself, and to many who feel the same way.
Every
day I wake up and the first thing I do is exactly what I did before going to
bed - checking the news from Gaza. The death toll, learning about the new
martyrs, witnessing the destruction, and confronting the silence, compliance,
and denial of most of the world. It's depressing.
Yes,
I am depressed.
But
I need to remember: this is not my battle. It is my war, but what is happening
in Gaza is not my battle. I need to fight my battles here, and if I do
everything I can - if we win the battle here - we will change reality to stop
the battle there, and hopefully prevent it from happening again.
I
know it's not easy. It's deflating. There's a sense of despair, a feeling that
nothing we're doing is making a difference. But that's wrong.
The
Balfour Declaration was in 1917 - that's how old this tragedy is. Today is only
another chapter.
It's
hard to ignore the reality on the ground in Gaza, but don't let their suffering
inhibit you, defeat you, or make you surrender. If anything, let it be the fuel
to raise your voice louder, to march further, to display solidarity stronger.
We
are winning. Yes, in our battle, we are. Palestine solidarity is mainstream.
BDS is mainstream. This is big - it took decades of work to get here.
So
don't feel despair. Feel proud.
Stay
calm, and carry on.
Ahmad
Baker
June
2025
Rule of law vs ruling by law : How we are descending into dictatorship
In
June 2000, the Syrian parliament gathered for an extraordinary session. The
constitutional age for a president was a minimum of 40. In a matter of minutes,
they voted to change it, lowering the minimum age to 34. Why the sudden
urgency? So Bashar al-Assad could become the new president, following his
father's that very day.
This
was perfectly lawful and constitutional – and a joke, perhaps, but undeniably
within the legal framework. This is the essence of ruling by law: where those
in power simply create or manipulate laws to suit their immediate needs and
enforce them, regardless of principle or justice.
This
stands in stark contrast to the rule of law, the bedrock of true democracies,
where laws apply equally to all, without exception or manipulation. You would
think such blatant perversions of the law could never happen in our
democracies.
Yet,
consider what we're witnessing today: the calculated silencing of pro-Palestine
voices in these same democracies. This isn't happening through brute force, but
through legal mechanisms – new legislation, old laws dusted off, or intricate
legal contortions. We've seen local hospitals banning pro-Palestinian
solidarity, introducing policies under various names claiming being apolitical
to serve political means. We have seen parliamentary legislation passed to ban
Palestine Action. Three hundred eighty-five votes approved this legislation,
bringing to mind the images of the Syrian parliament changing the constitution
within minutes. Later the courts have sanctioned it.
It's
all perfectly lawful.
So,
are we truly living under the rule of law, or are we subtly shifting towards
ruling by law?
I
know some will dismiss this as far-fetched, arguing we're not descending into
fascism or dictatorship. Maybe they're right, but maybe they're not. As Yuval
Noah Harari wisely observed: "It is an iron rule of history that what
looks inevitable in hindsight was far from obvious at the time."
Let's
engage in a vital thought experiment: Imagine a dystopian future, then trace
our steps back to the present. By understanding how we might arrive there,
perhaps we can stop it now.
Ahmad
Baker
One tick and ‘anti-Semitic’ fruit: The curse of being Palestinian
It was a normal Teams meeting at the end of a busy week. Colleagues were discussing the hospital weekend plans. I was there too, nodding, half-present. My mind was elsewhere – on a message I’d sent earlier that morning to a friend in Gaza.
I glanced at my phone.
One tick.
WhatsApp users know the signs: one tick means the message was sent. Two ticks mean it was received. Two blue ticks, it was read.
For most people, it’s a minor delay. But when you’re texting a Palestinian friend in Gaza during a war, one tick carries a sense of dread.
Maybe his phone’s out of charge – normal in a place where power was cut off 20 months ago. Maybe there’s no service – Israel often cuts communication during attacks. But there’s a third possibility I don’t allow myself to think about, even though it’s the most likely outcome if you are living through a genocide.
Still one tick.
Back in the meeting. We wrap up. Plans are made and people start to think about their own weekend plans.
I glance again. Still one tick.
This is the curse of being Palestinian. Carrying the weight of your homeland, its pain, its people – while being expected to function normally, politely, professionally.
Then, I was told my Teams background was “potentially anti-Semitic.”
It was a still-life image: figs, olives, grapes, oranges, watermelon, and a few glass bottles. A quiet nod to my culture and roots. But in today’s climate, even fruit is political. Any symbol of Palestinian identity can now be interpreted as a threat.
Suddenly, I was being questioned, accused, and possibly facing disciplinary action. For a background. For being Palestinian.
Still one tick.
I felt silenced, humiliated, and exposed. How was my love for my culture, for art, for my people being twisted into something hateful? Why is my choice of virtual background more controversial than the devastating violence unfolding in real time?
This is not isolated. Many of us – Palestinians, or anyone else who cares about Palestine – are being challenged on our humanity across organisations, all driven by external pressure.
And then it happened. Two blue ticks.
My friend was alive. He messaged: they fled their home in the early hours of the morning. He carried his children, walked for hours, left everything behind. No food, no shelter. But alive.
How could I explain to him what had happened to me that day? That while he ran for his life, I was threatened with disciplinary action about a painting of fruit? That I was accused of racism for an image, while he was witnessing the destruction of entire families?
This is what it means to be Palestinian today. To constantly navigate a world that erases your humanity, silences your voice, distorts your identity. To be told your pain is political. Your joy is provocation. Your symbols are offensive.
I’ve worked in the NHS for 25 years. It’s more than a job – it’s part of who I am. And now, along with two colleagues, I’m taking legal action. Not for ourselves, but to protect the NHS from external political lobbying. To say, firmly and clearly, that our National Health Service should belong to its patients and its staff – not to those who seek to silence, intimidate or twist it into serving a toxic agenda.
What happened to me is not just unjust – it is unlawful. Speaking up against genocide is not only my moral responsibility as a human being, but also my right as a British citizen in a democratic society.
I don’t write this to compare my experience with my friend’s suffering. I write it to expose the absurdity, the cruelty, of how Palestinians are treated across the world. Whether under bombs or under suspicion, we are made to justify our existence.
It shouldn’t be this way.
Being Palestinian is not a crime. But too often, it feels like the world treats it as one.
Ahmad Baker